Workflow decomposition
Define tasks, evidence, boundaries, and human responsibility actions before choosing tools.
Proof of capability
This is no longer just a personal portfolio. It shows the workflow decomposition, governance, security, eval, and delivery judgment behind the product experiments.
The TOEIC 880→990 library and SEC Filing Radar cover two different AI workflow boundaries: learning content and public-source data research.
A quality-checked gallery of original TOEIC 880→990 short drills organized by Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Listening, and Strategy.
Japan-based TOEIC 880+ scorers aiming for 950 / 990 as a career, promotion, or global-work signal
Live toolEnter a US ticker, find the SEC filings worth reading, and turn them into Chinese/Japanese source-linked briefs.
Cross-language US equity research, content research, consulting, company research
These public-safe docs answer the questions an enterprise AI Agent effort must address before pilot.
Four public-safe cases across legacy browser automation, HR, finance, and operations efficiency.
Defines users, citation rules, human review, escalation paths, and success metrics.
A workflow-owned pattern with typed handoffs, least-privilege tools, and human approval gates.
Evaluates agents through business impact, task quality, review outcomes, reliability, and governance.
The same core flow applies across learning products, public-data research, and enterprise agents.
Local folder or public ticker
Structured evidence, source links, risks
Human checklists and boundaries
Report, brief, CSV, or next intent
Define tasks, evidence, boundaries, and human responsibility actions before choosing tools.
Design for prompt injection, data leakage, over-automation, and audit events early.
Use sample reports, click intent, beta users, and pricing hypotheses to test demand.
Chinese, Japanese, and English serve different audiences rather than mechanical translation.
Posts will keep publishing notes on generative AI, business math, product validation, and AI workflows.